General
Learning not Leaning
Jun 10th

Learn, Don't Lean.
no time to proof read, spelling errors abound…enjoy!
As you may have guessed (it’s no secret), these blogs are born out of frustrating conversations. Conversations which just make me smack my forehead and, after a second or two of resistance, give up because debate is obviously pointless. I’m talking about conversations / discussions / debates where I just can’t respect the other point of view because it’s asserting a point of view that has, quite obviously, been pulled from elsewhere. The tell tale signs to me are:
- They are one sided, not willing to even look at the other side
- They use the exact same examples I’ve heard on TV, radio, read in the news, or heard thrown around in the local coffee shop
- They rely on ‘common sense’. They have a “well, everyone knows…” attitude about them without any actual facts or specifics
These conversations are frustrating not because I disagree with a point being made (sometimes I don’t) but because they smack of ignorance. They are full of popular thinking which was handed down to the person by someone else. There’s no fact checking. No critical thinking. No honest debate. They’re beliefs without basis, assertions without learning.
One Side Learns, The Other Side Leans
Normally, there’s 2 (or more) sides to a conversation like this. There’s a belief or point being debated. We live in a world where ‘everyone is entitled to their own ideas’, but we never stop to consider the fact that some people’s ‘ideas’ are uneducated. They’re talking points. They’re never researched or investigated. They’re easy to assert (maybe because they’re simple) but aren’t based on fact (sounds like sound-byte TV to me!).
For most issues I encounter, there is pretty obviously a side of the discussion which educates itself (usually endlessly) and one that doesn’t. Now, it seems obvious that logic dictates that the side who is actively educating themselves on the issue is going to be closer to the truth, doesn’t it? But in this ‘everyone has an right’ society, we overlook this point. We think that, ignorant or not, everyone can be right. Guess what? That’s crap.
One side is usually learning and the other side is ‘leaning’ on someone else’s ideas without actually fact checking or learning anything for themselves.
An Example
Let’s take an example of the learning vs. leaning idea: Ever since Food Inc. I hear lots of discussions about eating meat. Some people are against it, some people want to be against it, and some people defend their God given right to devour corn fed flesh. But did you ever notice something? How many books are there about how great it is to eat meat? How many scientists are out there saying “eating factory meat is great for our environment!”? None, that’s how many. On the other hand, how many people are writing books about the way meat-eating is wreaking havoc on our planet? How many news articles are there about what factory farms do to their workers? Generally, how many ‘for’ arguments vs. ‘against’ arguments are there?
This should tell you something: The people defending meat eating, to their death, aren’t out there reading book after book about how great it is. They aren’t pouring over the studies that show it’s great for our world and economy. They’re not because these things don’t exist. Yet, those out there against eating meat are sucking up book after book, study after study, learning all they can about the issue. They devour newspapers, news reports, and expert (and amateur) testimony on the subject.
Who here is learning and who is leaning? Who, is a more reliably source of fact and information?
We didn’t deal with those who want to be meat eaters. These are the folks who saw Food Inc. and think they understand the whole situation. They’re almost as bad as those defending meat in the sense that they’re simply taking pop culture thinking (and a single source) at it’s word, regurgitating everything they heard. They don’t continue study, they don’t dive deeper. They’re leaning (not learning) on a single film. Better..but still leaning.
Learn to Say “I don’t know”
If we could all learn to say “I don’t know” more often, we’d be in better shape. If you’re in a converation about food, or government, or politics, and you haven’t actually studied it, dove in, learned about it…just admit you don’t know. There’s no shame in that. Owning up to ignorance keeps it at bay.
On the other hand, next time you’re talking about how bad the president is, or how bad the economy is, make sure you’re basing it on concrete information. Make sure you haven’t taken Rush Limbaugh’s word for it. Make sure you aren’t just believing everything the New York Times spouts off. Read books & newspapers….LOTS of them. Once you feel like you actually understand what’s going on (and can defend that with FACT instead of gut feelings) then converse.
But until then, stop leaning. It’s really annoying (and embarasses you even if you don’t know it)
Love, Not Hate.
Mar 22nd
I sit down to write this the morning after a historic vote on Health Care here in the United States. I’ll confess right up front that I’m happy about the result (just to get that out of the way) but I know that many others, especially many Christians, are not. I don’t pretend to think that all Christians agree on everything (or the the bible dictates that one political party is right and another wrong) and I’m glad we can have such wide ranging views on the world and still follow the same Christ. All that being said, let me dive into my point:
This morning as I drove to my local Starbucks, I was listening to talk radio. They were, of course, talking about health care and taking phone calls on the topic. It was a self-proclaimed liberal talk show, so I was surprised that they took a call on the topic from an unashamed conservative. The caller mentioned, right off the bat, that he wasn’t happy about the bill’s passage and a conversation ensued about the good and bad points of the bill. I sat there shocked. A conversation ensued. Respectful back-and-forth took place. There was no yelling. There was no name calling. There were questions like “What don’t you like about the bill?” and statements such as “I can understand why you don’t like that…” I was flabbergasted. This was the political conversation of my dreams. Respectful adult disagreement on an important issue which was totally devoid of hate. I felt like America had progressed, even for just a minute.
Now, let me say that I have no illusions about why this conversation came easier on a liberal talk show than it might have on a conservative one today. It’s easy to feel generous and to be a good listener when you win. It’s easy to respect the other side when you know you bested them, politically. I won’t pretend I would be writing this blog entry if I was on the other side this morning…but good is good, even if I wouldn’t have felt like saying it after a ‘defeat’ of my ideals.
We Are A People Of Love
That brings this entry back around, as it always does, to my faith in Jesus and my involvement with Christianity. After hearing this debate on the radio, I sat down to my computer and launched my social networks. The vast majority of my friends on these networks are Christians and I was afraid to see what was being written.
Stop there for a second.
Why should I be afraid of what Christians were going to be writing this morning? Is it because I knew that a majority wouldn’t be happy about the outcome of last night’s vote? No, I wasn’t afraid of disagreement (the radio conversation just inspired hope through the voicing of disagreement). What I was afraid of was hateful disagreement.
The fact that I was afraid of this was based on previous experience. In the past my political and religious math tells me that Christianity + Politics = Hateful Speech. I can’t think of hardly a single exchange over the past years where a person of faith talked about political issues in a way that uplifted me or inspired me to follow Christ and love others more intensely.
Why is that? Why is today’s Christian political discussion seemingly based on mudslinging hate against “the gays”, “baby killers”, and “liberals” instead of on love, hope and inspiration? If I was outside the faith, why would I want to sign up for such hateful religion?
The Proper Response
I want to bring it back to that radio talk show discussion. Then I want to ask a question that I don’ t have an immediate answer for: How should Christians who disagree with last night’s vote address today’s world in love? What would a truly Christian response look like? Would it talk about killing babies or would it be thankful for the millions who will be helped through these changes? Would it assert the positive (and respectfully voice overall disagreement) or only mention the negative?
I know, I know. Christianity doesn’t mean being a hippie that only sees good. We know that there are evils that need to change. Jesus clearly saw those and spoke out against them (but let’s not forget: we’re not Jesus either, so we need to take that behavior with a grain of self-doubt). Is the most effective way for us to change things an approach based on love and respect? Or on hate and mudslinging?
I only ask for a loving response today. I don’t ask for agreement. I don’t ask for acceptance of things that go against our faith. But I do ask for love and respect. How are you, as a Christian, responding to last night’s vote? In love (be it disagreement or agreement) or hate?